I
watched this recently and found it really fascinating- precisely
because it was not the 'torture porn Dirty Dozen' it was strangely
marketed as but an amusing satire on modern Western cinema and
values. I have never seen Saving Private Ryan but found that some analysis I have seen of this film might proide a key to understanding IB.
I think that it is a kaleidoscope
narrative chopping up different films- there was indeed the goofy
21st century war film that was promised. And there was an
interesting but aborted film about Nazi occupied France (the Kubrick
connection suggested by the farmer). And, I would go much further than people who have said
they felt uncomfortable that it shows horrible violence by the
basterds and has some glamorous nazis- it actually contains a Nazi
propaganda film (not Nation's Pride, itself a far cleverer joke than
I've seen anybody notice).
Just think
-We are introduced to a suave,
intelligent, handsome quadrilingual Nazi officer who compares Germans
to noble hawks and Jews to rats. Many have said how sinister Waltz
was in this scene but if you listen to the dialogue he mentions that
he deduced where the Jews were hiding before setting foot in the
house and the point of his spiel was to give the farmer a chance to
save his family (his comments about rats and squirrels also show
Tarantino speaking about how easily people can be fooled by
superficiality)
-We are then introduced to an uncouth,
uneducated American who incites a group of ugly Jewish men to commit
horrific sadistic violence against Germans. 'They will be sickened by
us'. An oily looking Jewish man (Donny) smirks and shudders with
sexual delight as the brutal American speaks of torturing Germans,
Almost all the promotional material for
the film focused on this scene and in showing the basterds dressed in
civilian clothing or Nazi uniforms- these are sadistic bushwhackers
Next we are shown the basterds
surrounding an unarmed German soldier (Werner) and telling him he can
save his life by betraying his comrades or get barbarically killed
with a baseball bat. He refuses ('You cannot expect me to divulge
information that would put German lives in danger') and the basterds
whoop sadistically and cheer when Rain says that Werner will be
beaten to death by Donny whilst he looks unflinchingly. Hitler just
described Donny as 'the degenerate bear Jew'. 'bear' is slang for a
butch homosexual, as for 'degenerate' he is acted by the director of
a torture porn franchise and looks sexually stimulated by sadistic
violence on men and makes unfunny baseball jokes and looks like he's
orgasming after he kills the German soldier.
Werner has sharp features and intense
eyes- the noble hawk surrounded by rats? Donny even emerges from a
dank tunnel, the baseball bat sounding like an animal moving.
Our concepts of ultimate justice in WW2
makes us automatically assume that 'Ingloruious Basterds' means tough
guys who are morally righteous. But could these actually be
inglorious bastards? The poster shows the title and the basterds in
German uniforms. If we had a film about German soldiers dressing up
as allied soldiers or civilians and ambushing Americans then
sadistically killing them would we interpret the title the same way?
Incidentally, contrast this with the
American soldiers in Nation's Pride.
-We have another plot line about a
handsome, heroic, shy German sniper who ultimately gets shot in the
back by a Jewish woman impersonating a gentile
-Another plot involves a Gestapo
officer ingeniously uncovering some spies by a mere hand gesture and
subtly wrong accent, and remaining unflinching after being told that
he has a gun pointed at his gonads
-Interestingly this scene also involves
a handsome, youthful German with blond curls who is given a chance to
betray Aldo, who calls him 'Willy'- he doesn't but gets shot after
agreeing to lower his gun (cf gaunt, ageing skinhead Steamboat Willy
in SPR- squirrels/rats) A German collaborator then gets tortured by
the uncouth American
-The Jewish woman impersonating a
gentile says she will kill everyone in a cinema and cackles
artificially and sadistically as they are burnt alive and unarmed
Nazis are straffed by the bear Jew. We are shown a brief glimpse of a
reel with 'Dresden' written on it. A reference to a pretty horrific
chapter of the war where the allies incinerated thousands of
civilians.
Obviously this is not the sum total of
IB, but it does seem to me that Tarantino actually has incorporated a
Nazi propaganda film into a kaleidoscopic narrative in which the
three films co-exist with the same characters and plots often at the
same time (for instance the basement where the Nazi is very clever
but fails to notice Stieglitz beside him). I obviously don't think
that Tarantino is a Nazi, but I think he was playing a sophisticated
prank on audiences in the post-9/11 world of neo-con values, and
mocking our easy acceptance of sadism and torture as long as they are
framed in a certain narrative of righteousness and moral superiority.
Re the farmer who looks like Kubrick
(note also the bottle of milk) one thing I found interesting in this
scene was that Landa's French was a lot easier to understand than the
farmer's slurred, rapid speech- though the farmer then speaks clear
English. Could Tarantino be saying something about the difficulty in
studying a culture/ time- that clarity can itself be artificial? It's
the quirks and flaws that make authenticity which is something
Kubrick's obsessive nature would fail in.
Similarly, Shosana's wardrobe, her
oversized hat and sweaters, she looked like an American francophile
desperately trying to look French.
TBH I don't miss Kubrick's WW2 film
because recreating a foreign culture of a past age can be a thankless
task.
Secondly, it could be a reference to
interpreting Kubrick's films through Dionysian and Apollonian
concepts articulated by Nietzsche. Tarantino may be saying that if we
see Dionysian propaganda, in favour of physical courage and loyalty
then the Apollonian West will not understand. (Nietzsche's dichotomy
is drivel from a classicist perspective but an interesting mode of
analysis)
Thirdly, and relatedly, in A Clockwork
Orange Kubrick shows Alex with his eyes pinned open forced to watch
Nazi propaganda. Is this a clever joke by Tarantino, that he is
getting us to watch Nazi propaganda? The ostensible theme of ACO was
that if you destroy the Dionysian spirit in man, you will get sterile
order- Tarantino is going further and saying you can have a sadistic
and violent Apollonian culture which promotes cruelty without
glamorising physical courage.
In the neo-con era one word that really
nauseated me was using 'hawk' to refer to a middle aged armchair
warrior. Could Tarantino have been having a laugh at this? Soi-disant
'human rights hawk' (fat guy who supported other people fighting
wars) Christopher Hitchens loathed IB.
Aside from Kubrick people have also
mentioned Spielberg's name in the comments and I thought Tarantino
was being clever here as well.
In the cinema scene we have a Jewish
wraith who is burning the Nazis we are even shown Hitler's face
disintegrating at the same time.
Also, there is 'Nazi propaganda' film
within a film- 'Nation's Pride'- no title reference to sniping,
Nazism, or Germany. It features American soldiers bravely attacking a
German vantage point and getting slaughtered. Could this be Saving
Private Ryan with the cinematographic techniques inverted? Could the
title nation be America?
I even thought that the cornier aspect
of the WW2 film felt to me Spielbergian with its cartoonish politics
(the comedy Hitler like the last Indiana Jones film). I thought that
this was continued with the Hickox character who started off in the
supremely goofy film (it was hilarious casting the Canadian from
Austin Powers as a limey officer, especially with a Churchill whose
similarity was limited to being fat and bald) then he finds himself
in the other film where he gets rumbled by a hand gesture despite
learning perfect German. Shosana's escape is not a silly escape from
the farmhouse, but an escape from the Kubrick film to the Spielberg
one.
Tarantino starts off with Hickox in a
Spielberg film, then he nightmarishly finds himself in the Kubrick
film.
In SPR it looks like
Steamboat Willy ultimately cops one in the b***s- see what happens to
Heilstrom?
Hitler's response to Nation's Pride is very different from Goebells. The war veteran who was gassed and shelled laughing at the Hollywood portrayal of conflict?
No comments:
Post a Comment